As we progress building the WordTutor application, some of the functionality will be a great deal more complex - and that requires a better way to see what’s happening inside the application than we’ve had to date. It’s time to implement some logging.
We could, of course, use an existing logging library - but where’s the fun in that!
More seriously, the best logging library I ever used was one I used around twenty years ago while developing desktop applications in Delphi. This library had some innovative features, including the ability to automatically upload the logs to a central server if the application had previously crashed.
Perhaps the most useful feature of that library - and the one that I’d like to bring forward for use in the WordTutor, was support for hierarchical logging.
A problem I consistently see in application log files is that individual log messages lack context, making the messages less useful.
For example, what if you saw these log file messages:
Does the error message indicate the application has failed? Or is this a normal condition that happens when an optional configuration file isn’t being used?
By providing additional context as a part of our logging framework, we can make it clear. To illustrate, what if our logging looked like this:
Now it’s clear that the ERROR is normal, and that we don’t need to pay it particular attention.
To achieve this, let’s create a very simple base ILogger interface:
We’re supporting just three levels of information. The Info and Debug levels are likely obvious at first inspection - but why does Action
have a return value?
The IActionLogger interface allows logging to be made in a nested context, tracking the events that happen during that action.
In addition to all the normal logging messages, we can also indicate whether the action was successful, or not.
What do you think of this approach? I’d be interested in your feedback.
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus