A lot of the discussion about .NET 4.0 is revolving around the introduction of co-variance and contra-variance for generic types.

It’s important to remember, though, that these concepts aren’t entirely new - there has been some support for variance built into .NET for some time.

For example, consider this snippet of code:

    public Form1()
        textBox1.KeyPress += Handler;
        button1.Click += Handler;
        textBox1.KeyPress += new KeyPressEventHandler(Handler);
        button1.Click += new EventHandler(Handler);

    private void Handler(object sender, EventArgs e)
        label1.Visible = true;

You can see here the Handler() method being registered for both the TextBox.KeyPress event and the Button.Click event, even though these events have different parameters (Button.Click expects parameters object and EventArgs while TextBox.KeyPress expects object and KeyPressEventArgs).

What’s going on?

Without specific compiler support, this wouldn’t work. But, variance comes into play. The compiler recognises that the second parameter of Handler() is of type EventArgs - which is sufficiently general to accept any possible value that might be supplied by the event. Based on this observation, the compiler hooks up the event without complaint.


blog comments powered by Disqus
Next Post
TechEd New Zealand 2009  19 Sep 2009
Prior Post
Coming up to speed  10 Sep 2009
Related Posts
When (not) to use Var  16 Jul 2016
Semantic Types Redux  05 Jun 2016
Semantic Types in C#6  27 May 2016
Property Enhancements for C#  20 Dec 2015
Language Extensions for C#  19 May 2014
When should methods be Static?  09 Oct 2012
Of Method Naming and more  29 Sep 2012
Someone needs an intervention  16 Dec 2011
CallerInfo in C# 5  08 Dec 2011
Regions in C#  16 May 2011
More csharp posts »
Related Pages
September 2009 archive